86 Climate Quackery at the BBC

Green Evangelising at the BBC

BBC evangelisers evil greens, making memes that end the truth
The BBC should not have a Monbiot journalist

- There is nothing wrong with a Monbiot or Delingpole expressing a political opinion, what is wrong is for someone to do the same from within the cloak of objectivity worn by BBC reporters.
... that is quite simply Fraud
- Green Agents within the BBC :Harrabin, Matt McGrath, Toady Show, Evan Davies, Andrew Luck Baker,

- Isn't Andrew Neil the counter : no he's DIFFERENT, He questions properly rather than evangelises

Where is the line on evangelism/ universal ?

- Some things are accepted conservation, energy saving, but CO2 saving is political
Line is at fact or society consensus,

There are things you campaign on and things that are political

promoting :
saving energy -not
switching to renewables - political and going over line
- Activists are like Bankers they "have no skin in the fight" so are able to hype the market & ride the profits then afterwards when proved wrong can scarper without without consequences.
...raking in the bonus of "cool green credits"

For Climate Change there is no "consensus", just saying that there is a consensus, doesn't make it true. Especially when you offer no proper evidence for it at all. (All those in a position to challenge the 97% claim, but never did, you let the truth down)
- Consensus meme was one of the best PR lines ever created.
- For Climate Chsnge there is no "consensus", just saying that there is a consensus, doesn't make it true. Especially when you offer no proper evidence for it at all.
(All those in a position to challenge the 97% claim, but never did, you let the truth down)

They don't know they just believe

Dogma from within the Scientific cloak of objectivity : Pop-scientist people : Simon Singh, Robin Ince, Brian Cox, Simon Singh, Ben Goldacre. I am going to call such Green Dogma pushers Quaks ..yes anti-quack Sing is a prime Quak

namecalling has no justification in reporting, but in opinion pieces yes
what do you call them ? Climate Quacks of course
quak someone who quaks climate dogma without actually taking time to understand the validy of what they quak
qw
quak, quak - Poles Melting -
qw quak, quak - Polar Bears Dying .....

Jamie Whyte has also called quack good logician look him up
- Whyte finds a fatal flaw in this line of argument:

"The climate models that predict AGW have not been tested and they are not mere entailments of well-known physics and chemistry. Why, then, do scientists have such high levels of confidence in them? In other words, if a scientific consensus really does exist, this is what needs to be explained. It cannot explain itself, nor justify itself." socialismisnottheanswer --Delingpole comments
- QGood point. And I’d love to hear a convincing answer to this from the numerous well-known scientists who have used their prestige or their celebrity or their presumed expertise to help push the great climate change scare. I’m thinking here of everyone from Lord Winston and Sir Paul Nurse to science-background celebs such as Ben Goldacre, Simon Singh and Dara O’Briain, all of whom on various occasions have purported to know that “climate change” is a major problem because apparently there is some kind of “consensus” among scientists.Q

Strangely this ties into Shermer shouting "denier conspiracy"

They don't know the just believe

Fuel priced don't effect deaths
It's often thought that the spike in so-called 'excess' winter deaths is caused at least in part by the fact that some people living in poverty can't afford to turn up the central heating when freezing weather sets in.
- The idea is higher fuel prices cause MORE excess winter deaths, but there is no evidence of spikes in deaths falling on the poor, cos yes in cold weather deaths go up across all income groups just as much for rich as for poor. BBC More or Less @R4 bbcmoreor less

THANKS If you find some useful info here then click to easily/safely send me a Paypal TIP

1 2834 5 6 7 9 10

a Stew Green opinion
Out of the box thinking
- from someone who was never in the box in the first place
moved from the USEFUL BLOG to the REALITY CHECK BLOG

<-- BACK HOME REALITY CHECK INDEX * USEFUL BLOG INDEX
note/comments
NEXT -->